2011 - The Year We Take Back Congress and Make Obama's Life Hell!

Thursday, June 28, 2007

And People Want This Loser for President??


Elizabeth Edwards denied criticisms that her highly publicized on-air confrontation with conservative firebrand Ann Coulter was a calculated move designed to raise money for her husband’s presidential campaign.

“I hope I was provoking people across the country to speak out when they hear this kind of hate language,” Edwards told TODAY’s David Gregory. “It made a difference in the South when racist language used to be the way that everyone spoke.

“But then when decent people spoke out and said, ‘We don’t want to hear that anymore,’ it changed. And now racist language is not a part of civil dialogue in the South,” she went on. “We can accomplish the same thing, but only if people across the country speak out. I hope I was giving them a permission slip to do that.”

On Monday, Coulter had said on ABC’s Good Morning America that she wished John Edwards were killed in a terrorist attack. According to ABC News’ Web site, she said, “If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot.” Coulter added that she was just mimicking a comment Bill Maher had made on his HBO show about Vice President Dick Cheney.

During a discussion on the Iraq war, Maher had said that if Cheney were killed by terrorists, “More people would live. That’s a fact.” After those remarks, he later explained in his blog on The Huffington Post: “I believe that were he not in power, our troops would likely come home sooner. But I don't wish him dead.”

On Tuesday, Coulter was making an appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews to promote the paperback release of her book “Godless: The Church of Liberalism.” Elizabeth Edwards called in and for the next four minutes, while Coulter brushed aside her objections, the candidate’s wife appealed to Coulter to stop engaging in what Edwards calls "hate speech."

“I think we heard all we need to hear. The wife of a presidential candidate is asking me to stop speaking,” Coulter said.

Just ‘inflammatory rhetoric’?
In her telephone confrontation with Coulter, Edwards also implored her to stop the personal attacks and hate speech and engage in legitimate political dialogue. Later, the Edwards campaign used the row between the two women on its Web site to push for campaign contributions, leading some to conclude that Edwards’ call was a calculated move.

“I suppose if I had booked Ann Coulter on ABC or on Hardball on MSNBC at the end of the fundraising quarter, that complaint would be legitimate,” Edwards said. “I had no idea when she was going to roll out her book or when she was going to be on the air again.”

Edwards agreed that it’s not just commentators on the political right who are to blame.

“It’s not just Ann Coulter on the right,” she said. “Michael Savage [host of the radio talk show ‘Savage Nation’] is another example of someone who uses awful inflammatory language that degrades the political process, and the same is true on the left.” (TM - Oddly enough, she didn't name anyone from the left. Was the list too big for her to enumerate them all in her allotted time?)

But the Edwards family and Coulter have a particularly long and bitter history. Coulter has accused the Edwards of using the 1996 death of their son, Wade, in a car accident for political advantage. She has also directed homosexual slurs at Edwards.

(snip)

Edwards, who is battling cancer, said she’s feeling well. “One of the reasons I’m out there speaking is so people can see it’s possible to live with cancer and to live vital, full lives,” she said.

The TrekMedic muses:

How sad is it that the candidate with the $400 haircut has to hide behind the skirt of his cancer-ridden wife instead of confronting Coulter himself.

Sad,....just sad.

And yet, people continue to contribute to his campaign! Well,..you know what they say about throwing good money after bad,....

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 11:24 PM, Blogger Phillybits said...

A couple things to note:

1. “I think we heard all we need to hear. The wife of a presidential candidate is asking me to stop speaking,” Coulter said."

The wife of a presidential candidate actually asked Ann to stop using this type of dialogue. She said nothing to the tune of stop talking.

2. "How sad is it that the candidate with the $400 haircut has to hide behind the skirt of his cancer-ridden wife instead of confronting Coulter himself."

Skipping the haircut piece because it's silly, Edwards did respond.

3. The idea that this was a "calculated" and/or premeditated move on behalf of the Edwards camp is borderline tin-foil conspiracy talk.

After all,

“I suppose if I had booked Ann Coulter on ABC or on Hardball on MSNBC at the end of the fundraising quarter, that complaint would be legitimate,” Edwards said. “I had no idea when she was going to roll out her book or when she was going to be on the air again.”

 
At 11:31 PM, Blogger Phillybits said...

I guess it was all planned out last time Ann Coulter attacked Edwards too, when she called him a faggot and the Edwards camp responded in similar fundraising fashion.

Of course, if that were true, then it would mean the Edwards camp would have had to have received advance notice of Coulter's speech to know what she was going to say in order to prepare for the fundraiser emails and speeches.

Which..would mean...Coulter was in on the whole thing from the very beginning.

Now that's a conspiracy theory.

 
At 4:07 PM, Blogger MataHarley said...

I must say, even being of conservative mindset on many issues, I'm soooo not a fan of Ann Coulter.

In that same vein, I generally find the bru ha ha's of "she said/he said" with Coulter vs the latest target of her acerbic (and more often tasteless) humour about as appealing as 24/7 coverage of the Rosie/Trump feud, and yet another boring interview with that not-so-great talent, Paris Hilton. Unfortunately, the production types at talking head shows force this crap down our throats, and we've little option but to switch to a channel that isn't displaying the latest "breaking non-news".

However evoking the non-mandated "fairness doctrine", Coulter's column today states that walking to the set for the interview, she was advised that Ms. Edwards may call in. Obviously there was some preplanning prior to Ms. Edwards turning on the TV and magically finding Coulter on Chris' Lob Ball show.

This doesn't constitute a conspiracy, but certainly indicates Ms. Edwards was in the know prior to Coulter's introduction. Perhaps Lob Ball trailers, what not. All in all, can you say ho hum and who cares?

Reality is, these much ado about nothing, inconsequential feuds pay big bucks for all concerned. Elected elitists have themselves set the unbelievably low bar for the personal assaults and name calling by their increasingly uncivil and unprofessional behavior over the past decade or so.

And most of us are pretty disgusted with all of them... united in our non-partisan disdain of politicians and... yes... a sensationalist press corp with a penchant for ratings and yellow journalist headlines over truth and objective reporting. My journalism instructors from the 70s would be turning in their graves and the calibre of "reporters" today.

At least we're united in something - low approval ratings of just about everyone on the beltway and those that cover them.

 
At 6:07 PM, Blogger TheBitterAmerican said...

3. The idea that this was a "calculated" and/or premeditated move on behalf of the Edwards camp is borderline tin-foil conspiracy talk.

You'll get no arguments from me on that point.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home