Just "Cos?" (Revisited)
Montco D.A.: 'Insufficient credible and admissible evidence'
By NICOLE WEISENSEE EGAN
weisenn@phillynews.com
As I have stated in a previous posting, I don't traffic in conspiracy theories, but I believe this was all a poorly-thought out attempt to silence Bill Cosby's criticisms of black America.
I tend to disagree. In Kobe's case, the question wasn't "did it happen?" The question was "Yes, but was it consensual?" In Cosby's case, a woman suddenly remembered that he (Cosby) drugged and fondled her. This epiphany came a year later and, in all that time, she was still making contact with Cosby!
Puh-leeze! Somebody who wanted Cosby to stop contradicting the "official" blame-game policies of the NAACP went on a fishing expedition and found this woman, twisted her story, and went public with it to the MSM.
As stated before, in a country where style trumps substance, the MSM jumped on this like chum draws a shark to a fisherman.
Addendum for February 19, 2005:
The 'victim' is now going to file suit against Cosby. This is now a no-win situation for him because:
- A) If his insurance gets him to settle out of court, the stigma of guilt will hang over his head for quite awhile
- B) If he chooses to fight this, he'll be tied up in court for a long time. His legal handlers will advise against him making public appearances, thereby silencing his criticism of black America.
"Much exists in this investigation that could be used (by others) to portray persons on both sides of the issue in a less-than-flattering light," he said.
Either way, the NAACP wins on this one!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home