2011 - The Year We Take Back Congress and Make Obama's Life Hell!

Saturday, February 19, 2005

Just "Cos?" (Revisited)

No criminal charges against the Cos
Montco D.A.: 'Insufficient credible and admissible evidence'

By NICOLE WEISENSEE EGAN

weisenn@phillynews.com

I'm glad to see that "justice was served."

As I have stated in a previous posting, I don't traffic in conspiracy theories, but I believe this was all a poorly-thought out attempt to silence Bill Cosby's criticisms of black America.

In yesterday's Daily News (a/k/a The Fishwrapper), Michael Smerconish had an editorial piece on all of this foolishness. He likened the Cosby ordeal with the Kobe Bryant incident.

I tend to disagree. In Kobe's case, the question wasn't "did it happen?" The question was "Yes, but was it consensual?" In Cosby's case, a woman suddenly remembered that he (Cosby) drugged and fondled her. This epiphany came a year later and, in all that time, she was still making contact with Cosby!

Puh-leeze! Somebody who wanted Cosby to stop contradicting the "official" blame-game policies of the NAACP went on a fishing expedition and found this woman, twisted her story, and went public with it to the MSM.

As stated before, in a country where style trumps substance, the MSM jumped on this like chum draws a shark to a fisherman.

Addendum for February 19, 2005:

The 'victim' is now going to file suit against Cosby. This is now a no-win situation for him because:
  • A) If his insurance gets him to settle out of court, the stigma of guilt will hang over his head for quite awhile
  • B) If he chooses to fight this, he'll be tied up in court for a long time. His legal handlers will advise against him making public appearances, thereby silencing his criticism of black America.
Quote from MontCo DA Bruce Castor: Castor, who announced the decision on his Web site, said he did not plan any further comment for fear his comments would be used as evidence in any possible civil lawsuit.

"Much exists in this investigation that could be used (by others) to portray persons on both sides of the issue in a less-than-flattering light," he said.


Either way, the NAACP wins on this one!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home