2011 - The Year We Take Back Congress and Make Obama's Life Hell!

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

I Guess He Can't Call for a "Hail Mary" Pass Anymore, Either?

A New Jersey school board was within its rights to tell a football coach he cannot kneel and bow his head as his players have a student-led pregame prayer, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia reversed a lower-court ruling made almost two years ago. Each of the panel's three judges wrote an opinion on the case, which pits the right to free speech against the freedom from official establishment of a religion.

The judges agreed that the East Brunswick Board of Education's policy barring school staff from joining in student-led prayer was constitutional.

But the judges differed on what exactly a coach should do when his team prays.

From the time Marcus Borden became the Bears' coach in 1983, he was deeply involved in team prayers; for a time, he led them.

In 2005, school officials received complaints that he was leading prayers and asked him to stop participating. He sued the school board, seeking to be allowed to bow his head and kneel when students led their own prayers. A lower-court judge found that should be allowed.

But Judge D. Michael Fisher wrote in the lead opinion yesterday that Borden's past action of leading the prayers made his head-bowing seem inappropriate: "A reasonable observer would conclude that he is continuing to endorse religion when he bows his head during the pre-meal grace and takes a knee with his team in the locker room while they pray."

Judge Theodore McKee wrote that kneeling or head-bowing would look like an endorsement of religion even to someone who did not know the coach had led prayers in the past.

Judge Maryann Trump Barry wondered what a coach in Borden's position should do. "Surely he would not be required to keep his head erect or turn his back or stand and walk away," she wrote. "Any such requirement would evidence a hostility to religion that no one would intend."

Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which represented the school board, said the case showed that school employees should avoid looking like they're endorsing religion in any way.

"Extreme care needs to be given to any involvement by school personnel even with student-led religious activities because it's very easy to cross the line and find yourself over the constitutional cliff," Lynn said.

Borden's lawyer, Ronald Riccio, said he would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the case to clarify what he said was murky law - especially given yesterday's decision - about student-led prayer.

"As the matter now stands, some coaches can bow their head and take a knee," Riccio said.


The TrekMedic simply shakes his head and thinks:

Stupid,...stupid,...stupid,....

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

At 8:57 PM, Blogger Lisa Mossie said...

I'm not a religious person at all, but that being said, this whole "separation of church and state" thing has progressed way beyond rationality. We started out policing our public organizations from promoting one religion over another. It has now morphed from having a religion forced on you to having religion mentioned in a public forum.

Most of the legal arguments billing themselves as "separation of church and state" are based upon the premise that any mention of a specific religion is "exclusionary" and that people who are not members of said religion may feel "excluded".

Now, if we conservatives were starting to feel litigious (and if we get a dem administration in November, perhpas this will be a good way to amuse ourselves through four years of darkness) we could start pressing the case that environmentalism is a religion. "I'm sorry, I don't believe in global warming. Please separate your religion from my state run institution." Imagine how far we could take this. Imagine how crazy it would drive the liberals!

 
At 10:36 PM, Blogger mdmhvonpa said...

When these dogmatic extremists shuffle off their mortal coil, I wonder if they will feel excluded if St Paul meets them at the Pearly Gates ... and turns his back.

 
At 9:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This has gotten absolutely ridiculous. As far as I know, it's freedom of religion, not freedom from religion!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home